acidicus24 wrote:1Greg since ninjago in the production is why it is undisclosed 2014?
2I have already answered this three times, Acidicus. You know why we do not release information on sets four, five, six months ahead of time. Asking the question again and again is not going to get you a different answer.
ScribeGT6817 wrote:firnron002 wrote:1Dear Mr Farshtey,
2This is from a big fan of LEGO, especially bionicle. I've been wondering a few things:
3My main thing is: if you were to continue the Bionicle story, (you have unlimited time, resources, writers etc) where would you have taken the story?
4Is there a Bionicle idea that you've rejected at any point?
5Finally, is there anything you wish you could have done differently with Bionicle?
6Thank you for your time. And have a nice day.
71) Well, our plan was to stay on Spherus Magna for two more years at least and start delving into the mysteries of the Great Beings.82) Oh, sure. That is what brainstorm meetings are for, to come up with ideas, keep some, toss others.
93) Yes. I would not have had Vakama turn bad in 2005. I never liked that idea.
10@3) Would you have had any main character(s) turn bad? Also, if you never liked that idea, why was it used?
zane1188 wrote:1cool thanks but why replace it with hero factory
2Hero Factory was one of a number of potential successors that came out of brainstorms held after the decision to end BIONICLE was made. It was the one that tested the best. And while it was never BIONICLE 2002 (no one expected it to be), it has sold well enough to be around for four years now.